Contribute

Additions and corrections are reviewed in public through GitHub issues and pull requests. Every material claim should be tied to a source.

Choose a form

Suggest an initiative

Propose a new public initiative with a canonical page and dated primary evidence.

Open GitHub form

Report a correction

Correct a claim, status, date, source, classification, or missing disclosure.

Open GitHub form

Request a review or takedown

Raise a dispute, privacy concern, rights issue, or request for expedited review.

Open GitHub form

What to include

  • The canonical website or documentation page.
  • At least one dated primary source for inclusion or a material update.
  • A short, neutral description of what the initiative does.
  • The relevant AI pipeline stages and data types.
  • Exact support for any adoption, money, or data-volume figure.
  • Known uncertainty, conflicting evidence, or an archive link when available.
  • Any material employment, financial, advisory, or organizational connection.

Review workflow

  1. A submission is checked against the published scope and minimum evidence rule.
  2. Claims, dates, links, status, and classifications are reviewed against public sources.
  3. Questions or requested changes remain in the issue or pull request for a public record.
  4. Nick Vincent gives final editorial approval before publication.
  5. Merged changes publish through the production build and deployment checks.

There is no guaranteed response time. Urgent factual, privacy, security, or rights concerns should be labeled clearly in the issue title.

Pull requests

Pull requests are welcome for source-backed records, corrections, glossary changes, tests, and site improvements. Read the methodology before editing catalog content.

Open a pull request

Credit

GitHub preserves contributor and reviewer credit in issue and commit history. Substantive source contributions may also be acknowledged in the related profile when appropriate.